A moment passes and everyone relaxes, the bell is just marking the end of a lesson. Three rings would have meant time to take cover. Largely unreported, the conflict in eastern Ukraine is now in its fourth year and children continue to suffer the consequences. At least , children live on both sides of this line and their physical safety and psychological well-being is constantly under threat.
Essay about Atomic Bomb
The Atomic Bomb: Was It Nessesary Essay Example For Students - words | Artscolumbia
A bomb shelter is a structure designed to provide protection against the effects of a bomb. Different kinds of bomb shelters are configured to protect against different kinds of attack and strengths of hostile explosives. An air-raid shelter is a structure built to protect against bomber planes dropping bombs over a large area. A fallout shelter is a shelter designed specifically for a nuclear war , with thick walls made from materials intended to block the radiation from fallout resulting from a nuclear explosion. Many such shelters  were constructed as civil defense measures during the Cold War. A blast shelter protects against more conventional bomb blasts.
Soviet atomic bomb project
This paper explores how wellbeing is cultivated inside of domestic bomb shelters on Israel's contested and heavily militarised northern borders with Lebanon and Syria. It draws from ethnographic research conducted during what is locally referred to as being a time between wars, or a 'period of quiet', in the ongoing regional conflicts affecting these borders. Contrasting the upkeep and organisation of shelters situated in two private homes on the same street, the paper explores how shelters are used to foster a localised sense of wellbeing in a time of 'quiet', as well as who is seen to demonstrate wellbeing in this context. Each shelter is a place where the temporal position of being between past and future war is visceral.
Both countries were forced to confront the unprecedented prospect of sudden, massive losses to their populations. The question of civil defense—the protection of civilian lives during a nuclear exchange—was passionately debated in the executive and legislative branches of the United States government, with scientists and academics weighing in. Was civilian protection technically and logistically feasible for this new level of weaponry, and at what cost? Was the United States government obligated to provide this protection for its citizens, whose elected officials formulated nuclear policy and whose taxes funded nuclear production? What role did civil defense have in overall nuclear strategy?