Both men sometimes wrote four papers in a single week. An older scholar, John Jay, later named as first chief justice of the Supreme Court, wrote five of the papers. Hamilton, who had been an aide to Washington during the Revolution, asked Madison and Jay to help him in this project. Their purpose was to persuade the New York convention to ratify the just-drafted Constitution. They would separately write a series of letters to New York newspapers, under the pseudonym, "Publius.
Review of Federalist Paper #10
Free Federalist Essays and Papers | Help Me
Last Updated: March 29, References. To create this article, 9 people, some anonymous, worked to edit and improve it over time. There are 17 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been viewed , times. Learn more Written in and , these articles offered arguments in favor of the newly written Constitution of the United States. The Federalist Papers are frequently cited in works that analyze the U.
Federalist 10 Paper
Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals. James Madison answers the question of how to eliminate the negative effects of faction. Madison believes the most serious source of faction is the diversity of opinion in political life, which leads to dispute over fundamental issues such as what system of government or religion should be preferred. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority, and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party. Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security of the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent.
Federalist No. Published on November 22, under the name "Publius", Federalist No. Madison saw factions as inevitable due to the nature of man—that is, as long as people hold differing opinions, have differing amounts of wealth and own differing amount of property, they will continue to form alliances with people who are most similar to them and they will sometimes work against the public interest and infringe upon the rights of others. He thus questions how to guard against those dangers. The whole series is cited by scholars and jurists as an authoritative interpretation and explication of the meaning of the Constitution.