Socialism is a political , social , and economic philosophy encompassing a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production. Socialist systems are divided into non-market and market forms. Profits generated by these firms would be controlled directly by the workforce of each firm or accrue to society at large in the form of a social dividend. Socialist politics has been both internationalist and nationalist in orientation; organised through political parties and opposed to party politics; at times overlapping with trade unions and at other times independent and critical of them; and present in both industrialised and developing nations. The socialist political movement includes a set of political philosophies that originated in the revolutionary movements of the mid-to-late 18th century and out of concern for the social problems that were associated with capitalism. Today, many socialists have also adopted the causes of other social movements such as environmentalism , feminism and progressivism.
The Difference Between Knowledge and Belief
Difference Between Information and Knowledge (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences
Both Liberty and Freedom are synonyms. It is the condition of having the power to act and speak without restraints. Liberty is the condition wherein individuals behave according to their will and govern themselves, taking responsibility for their actions and behaviors. Having liberty does not necessarily mean going against ethics and moral values.
Difference Between Information and Knowledge
Epistemologists study the nature, origin, and scope of knowledge, epistemic justification , the rationality of belief , and various related issues. Epistemology is considered one of the four main branches of philosophy, along with ethics , logic , and metaphysics. Debates in epistemology are generally clustered around four core areas:   . In these debates and others, epistemology aims to answer questions such as "What do we know?
Most people who bother with the matter at all would admit that the English language is in a bad way, but it is generally assumed that we cannot by conscious action do anything about it. Our civilization is decadent and our language — so the argument runs — must inevitably share in the general collapse. It follows that any struggle against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes. Underneath this lies the half-conscious belief that language is a natural growth and not an instrument which we shape for our own purposes. Now, it is clear that the decline of a language must ultimately have political and economic causes: it is not due simply to the bad influence of this or that individual writer.