Literature reviews provide a more complete picture of research knowledge than is possible from individual pieces of research. This can be used to: clarify what is known from research, provide new perspectives, build theory, test theory, identify research gaps or inform research agendas. Systematic reviews are a type of literature review. They have a clear, logical rationale that is reported to the reader of the review.
Scientific Literature Review Resources and Services
What is a systematic review? - Systematic Reviews - LibGuides at Austin Peay State University
The third systematic literature review of SARS-CoV-2 research published through November summarizes current research on how the virus is spread, virus attenuation on commonly found materials, and effectiveness of various prevention and decontamination measures. Download the systematic review. Download the key takeaways. Download PDF. Phase 3 - Systematic literature review The third systematic literature review of SARS-CoV-2 research published through November summarizes current research on how the virus is spread, virus attenuation on commonly found materials, and effectiveness of various prevention and decontamination measures. Key takeaways from the review SARS-CoV-2 is generally understood to spread primarily through virus-containing water droplets expelled from infected persons from sneezes, coughs, speaking, and other respiratory activities.
Literature reviews and systematic reviews
Image: David Parmenter's Shop. Image by TraceyChandler. Quick overview of the process:.
A systematic literature review is a research methodology designed to answer a focused research question. Authors conduct a methodical and comprehensive literature synthesis focused on a well-formulated research question. Its aim is to identify and synthesize all of the scholarly research on a particular topic, including both published and unpublished studies. Systematic reviews are conducted in an unbiased, reproducible way to provide evidence for practice and policy-making and identify gaps in research.